THE JARROLD FILE
by Bill Chalker
copyright B.Chalker, 1999
EARLY AUSTRALIAN UFOLOGY
In July, 1952, in response
to a huge wave of sightings at the time, and one of his own, during
May, 1951, Edgar Jarrold, 33 year-old foundry office worker, husband,
and father of 2 young children, began Australia's first civilian flying
saucer organisation.
Photo here
Initially a one man affair, the
Australia Flying Saucer Bureau (AFSB) headquartered in Sydney, was by
May, 1953, publishing Australia's first UFO publication, the Australian
Flying Saucer Magazine.
Photo here
An extract from Edgar Jarrold's
"personal biography" from his idiosyncratic typewriter during
January, 1954.
On February 6, 1953, 5 Victorians
founded the Australian Flying Saucer Investigation Committee (AFSIC).
The organisation's chairman was journalist Donald Thomson. In South
Australia, during 1953, the Australian Flying Saucer Club (AFSC) was
started by Fred Stone.
Photo here
An extract from Edgar Jarrold's "personal biography" from
his idiosyncratic typewriter during January, 1954
JARROLD AND THE DRURY FILM AFFAIR
While civilian interest was growing,
extensive official interest focused on a daylight movie footage of an
extraordinary unidentified "missile" over Port Moresby, taken
by Tom Drury, the Deputy Director of the Department of Civil Aviation
(DCA) in Papua New Guinea, then an Australian territory.
On August 23rd, 1953, Tom Drury
was taking pictures at about midday. The sky was clear, when a small
cloud began to form. After a few minutes a silver object came out of
the cloud. Drury had started filming. The object climbed very fast,
with a vapour trail behind it clear marking its trajectory.
Photo here
A Directorate of Air Force
Intelligence (DAFI) print of a frame from the Drury film
Found by the author in the DAFI files
Photo here
A somewhat erroneous artist's
impression of the Drury film sequence
It was gone in a few seconds.
A handwritten note in DAFI files specifically states that the object
was not a secret missile firing from Woomera.
The Drury UFO film became a controversial
and famous mainstay of the Australian contribution to the UFO "cover-up"
argument. It became all the more controversial when it was claimed that
the UFO section of the film was missing and the RAAF were denying any
knowledge of its whereabouts.
A 1955 RAAF UFO file indicates
that DAFI had sold prints of the 1953 UFO pictures "at 4/9 a pop"
to civilian researchers. Edgar Jarrold and Fred Stone were among those
who secured copies of these prints.
Edgar Jarrold's own publication,
the Australian Flying Saucer Magazine, stated in its February, 1955,
issue that "94 prints examined reveal conclusively the existence
of a shiny, disc-like object whose behaviour could by no wildest stretching
of the imagination be attributed to a bird, balloon, orthodox aircraft,
hallucination, piece of windblown paper, natural phenomena, or a meteor.
The cloud from which the silvery object ... emerged is distinctly visible.
On emerging from it at a right
angle with no other clouds apparent in a clear sky, still pictures reveal
vivid confirmation of Mr. Drury's report that an object, looking at
first like a tiny brilliant sun, dashed rapidly from the cloud, heading
north-west. The object flashed brightly in the sun as it made an abrupt
right-angle turn soon after emerging from the dark cloud, zooming straight
up with no reduction in speed. Upon reaching a greater altitude, it
levelled off again, with another abrupt right-angled turn (Jarrold's
emphasis - B.C.), resuming its north-west flight thereafter until out
of camera range altogether....
On effecting such turns, a greater
expanse of the object's upper surface becomes visible, causing it to
present a featureless, disc-like appearance, which is in sharp contrast
to first glimpses showing an object somewhat blurred in focus, and shaped
like a theoretically fast moving, very bright star."
Jarrold wrote years later, "...I was able to view blown up still
pictures made from this film before it left Australia due to the American
request and am still, I think, the only civilian ever to have seen them.
The pictures show what could
only be accepted as an extra-terrestrial object, the flight path and
behaviour of which, rule out any man made object or meteor. The film
was made about midday against a cloudless sky and unfortunately the
object was filmed from a distance, thus providing little real knowledge
of the object's shape and composition, main importance being attached
to it's most unusual actions and behaviour.".
It should be noted that Drury
himself observed no discontinuity in the UFO's flight path. Whether
the claims of 90o turns were legitimately recorded on the film, or were
due to camera movement, or were artifacts of processing, analyses or
just plain extravagant interpretations based on limited or poor data,
we may never know. The references to 90o turns all stem from Jarrold.
No one else, who either saw the film or prints, made such claims. The
limited prints I have make any analysis impossible. They are very poor
in quality.
Documentation I examined in the
DCA and DAFI files contradicts Jarrold's claims to have been the only
one to have seen the prints and to have seen them before the original
footage was sent to the United States.
A letter to Jarrold from Mr.
E.W. Hicks, secretary, the Department of Air, dated December 2nd, 1953,
states that "the film has been sent to the United States for technical
processing, and it is therefore, not possible to accede to your request
(for contact prints - B.C.) until its return, which, it is anticipated,
will be early in the New Year..."
The Minister for Air, Mr. McMahon,
was quoted in the press during late January, 1954, that he "had
the film flown to the U.S to be enlarged." He further stated that
the object "was so small that a detailed study of the film was
not possible until tecnicians had enlarged it." (McMahon, 1954).
The official files also records a letter from DAFI to Mr. Wiggins of
the DCA dated 12/7/54 which states, "The "Flying Saucer"
film taken by Mr. T.C. Drury, at Port Moresby in 1953 and forwarded
by you on 22 Sept. is returned here with.
We have subjected the film to
detailed study and processing but have been unable to establish anything
other than the blur of light appears to move across the film. In spite
of this disappointment we would like to thank you for your co-operation
in this matter." Thus the evidence suggests that Jarrold would
have not got his prints until July, 1954. probably during a meeting
he had with Air Force intelligence. Fred Stone also received copies
of the same prints late in 1954 during a meeting he had with Air Force
intelligence.
In a letter Stone wrote to the
Director of Air Force Intelligence in 1973 he stated " The original
film was much clearer to view when shown on a screen and I can only
presume that the use of them by the bodies of the USA Air Force, then
their Navy Dept. plus our own Air Force and Navy caused them to get
into the state they were when the blow up copies were made. I might
add that I kept my promise to the official at the time when I was interviewed
in Melbourne regarding same and they have never been shown publicly
and only to executives of UFO Groups and Societies and then on a very
select basis..."
The orginal Drury film, which
allegedly held the UFO image, became something of a "holy grail"
for Australian ufology. A number of efforts were made over the years
to secure the film and further information about the affair. All largely
met with failure.
"THE MARS CONNECTION"
Edgar Jarrold, of the Australian
Flying Saucer Bureau (AFSB), had stated in a January 7th, 1954, press
release that record waves of sightings had occurred in 1950 and 1952
during previous close approaches of Mars. He therefore expected that
record sightings would occur during 1954. Jarrold had already communicated
that view to the Australian Minister for Air as far back as November,
1952.
Jarrold's suggestion of a 'Mars
connection' in the saucer mystery was supported by contemporary expert
thought. During an Australian visit in 1954. French Mars expert, Dr.
Gerard de Vaucouleurs, was quoted as saying, "There is something
remarkable on Mars. If we could one day conclude there was activity
displayed by reasoning minds on Mars, what a prodigious upheaval it
would cause in human thought." Incredibly, of his Mt. Stromlo observatory
Mars viewing , de Vaucouleurs said, "This is not only a learned
probe for academic information. It is also a hunt for possible enemies
from space."
THE "JARROLD MYSTERY"
While the RAAF was confronting
"the UFO problem" civilian research was in disarray following
the "disappearance" of pioneer researcher Edgar Jarrold. The
"Jarrold mystery" was absorbed into the notorious Albert K.
Bender saga, and seemed to share a lot of the bizarre elements of it.
Bender's US organisation, one of the earliest flying saucer groups,
closed suddenly.
Many enthusiasts concluded Bender
had been silenced and the whole saga was aired in Gray Barker's notorious
book, "They Knew Too Much about Flying Saucers". Bender fed
the paranoia bandwagon when he broke his silence with the book, "Flying
Saucers and the Three Men". Bender claimed alien agents,"three
men in black", silenced him preventing him from revealing the truth
about the saucers.
Photos here
Albert K. Bender
Jarrold's "disappearance"
was used to fed the burgeoning "men in black" legend. However,
a critical analysis of the Jarrold affair argues for a more prosaic
explanation than the paranoid alien "men in black" myth. In
part Jarrold was a "victim" of what has been called the "UFO
widow" syndrome,.ie. his obsession with the saucer mystery lead
to a disintergration of his life.
By the end of 1953, Edgar Jarrold
had come to think he had confronted the solution to the saucer mystery.
The answer was a secret he felt he shared with "select" researchers
with the key to the UFO enigma, namely the likes of Albert Bender and
others. Early in 1953 he announced that he had under consideration 5
theories for UFO origins, namely "red star, stellar, Mars, Biblical
or 4-D origins".
During 1953 Jarrold, Bender and
pioneer New Zealand researcher Harry Fulton focused on the idea of a
saucer base in Antartica ("the mysterious Project 'X' ").
Such approaches were naive by modern standards, but the stuff of superficial
enquiry was the foundation of "saucer research" of the fifties.
It is interesting to note that each of these three early researchers
reported experiencing unusual manifestations of odours and violent knocking
noises.
Light phenomena also allegedly
occurred in the cases of Jarrold and Fulton. Such ranges of phenomena
have under different circumstances been attributed to occult or paranormal
agencies. They are even suggestive of poltergiest-like manifestations.
Bender's "experiences" were much more colourful and less believable.
His tales of "the 3 men" and alien contact appear to be the
stuff of fantasy. Jarrold also spoke of 2 men in a car keeping vigil
on his house. These individuals were allegedly "identified"
as "criminals, reputed gunmen holding police records".
Some of the incidences described
by Bender, Fulton and Jarrold may suggest clandestine intelligence activity.
Were they being monitored by the likes of the FBI (in the case of Bender),
ASIO (in the case of Jarrold) and the New Zealand Security Intelligence
Branch (SIB, in the case of Fulton)? The cold war paranoia prevelant
at the time makes the possibility of such exercises more than idle speculation.
In the November, 1953 issue
of the Australian Flying Saucer Magazine, Jarrold wrote that with the
closure of Bender's UFO organisation, "if the facts are exactly
as they appear to be, the surfeit of theories regarding actual flying
saucer origin has been drastically reduced to no more than two. One
of these is that saucers originate from Mars - with all that that momentous
fact conveys and implies.
The other theory involves a staggering
event which, unfortunately, for very vital reasons, cannot be revealed
- or even discussed theoretically - ... until specific additional data
(not currently in the possession of the A.F.S.B.) has either established
or rejected it with positive certainty. All that can be conveyed here
is that the particular information emphasises the cause of flying saucers
rather than their origin." Jarrold had been promoting the Mars
connection as far back as November, 1952, even communicating his ideas
to the Minister for Air at the time.
JARROLD AND "THE MYSTERIOUS
VISITOR"
Jarrold appeared to be waiting
for some compelling development to focus his obsessions on. That focus
materialised in the guise of a "mysterious visitor" who visited
Jarrold on 4 seperate occassions during December, 1953 and swore him
to secrecy. The visits had a profound effect on Jarrold. What the "visitor"
told him amazed him "beyond belief", and while indicating
he was not frightened by what he had learnt, Jarrold indicated he could
not guarantee that others would not have been terrified.
Jarrold never publically revealed
who the "mysterious visitor" was or what amazed him "beyond
belief", but both matters were revealed independently as Jarrold
set about informing Harold Fulton in New Zealand that the "visitor"
was going to visit him! Jarrold sent Fulton several telegrams and letters
building up Fulton's expectation that the visitor would reveal "fantastic
information." Fulton as it turned out was not impressed by Jarrold's
"mysterious visitor". It is easy to understand why.
The visitor in fact was not so
mysterious. Indeed he was Gordon Deller, a energetic worker behind the
scenes in early Australian ufology, who had some quaint and rather bizarre
theories about flying saucers. The theory he revealed to Jarrold was
based on the occult UFO tradition of the Ethereans. The "terrifying"
dimension of Deller's credo was his "revelation" that the
saucer mystery was linked with a coming geological cataclysm.
Photos here
(from l to r) Gordon Deller,
Andrew Tomas, Fred Phillips & Dr. Mirian Lindtner
Source: "People", January 9, 1957
Andrew Tomas, Jarrold's Sydney
co-worker, indicated that Gordon Deller "after a rather material
life, all of a sudden discovered a few years ago that the human mind
has strange faculties which can help man pierce the veil of time. One
day he just walked into strange knowledge which has to do with a geological
cataclysm (man created) destined to break out very soon. Mr. Deller
mentioned this to Jarrold who was interested and impressed. He also
told him something about methods of telepathic communication. I think
that was about all. I have told Mr. Jarrold a great deal more, particularly
at a time when he was puzzled about 4D happenings at his place".
This took the form of "strange audible phenomena" which Tomas
put into a wider flying saucer occult context.
ANDREW TOMAS' OCCULT PERSPECTIVE
Tomas believed "that a War
of Two Worlds is going on and that terrestrial and cosmic forces are
arrayed for battle." "Saucers have been known in the East
for thousands of years. Their present appearance in mass has been foretold
long, long ago. They are only an effect, not the cause, and the cause
is the great struggle between the Forces of Good, of Culture, of Enlightenment
- and of Evil, of Hate, and Darkness", wrote Tomas in a letter
to Barker in 1956. Tomas took such matters seriously enough that he
made plans to respond to them.
In a letter to Frederick Phillips,a
UFOIC co-worker, in 1957 Tomas revealed that he was planning to start
up a business in the Queensland countryside with the President of the
Queensland UFO group, Charles Middleborough.
"Besides in the bush there
will be more scope for the realisation of Project Contact Space. (Middleborough)
had a UFO hovering right over his house already. I wish you would materialise
that plan about space contact you talked to me about. This should have
priority because (excuse me for talking like our mutual friend G.D.)
I am absolutely certain of the approach of the cataclysm. Cofidentially
the friend in Queensland and myself have been working on a 'saviour
community' for the last 2 years. Not to save ourselves but some fruits
of our culture.
There are at least 3 or 4 in
America and a number in India and other countries. Another one coming
up in Sth. America. All prefer to keep quiet about it. Some have stocked
up food for a year or more", he wrote to Phillips.
By March, 1958, Andrew Tomas
was circulating a draft for a PLANETARY PACT
- "an international treaty for a planetary pool of natural resources,
means of production, manpower and scientific genius." He was advocating
"a planetary government for the Space Age". One of its ultimate
aims was "to step up space projects once there is a Planetary Government
to control the resources pooled by all the countries, and then to attempt
contacts with other planets being prepared to find life on some of them.
From a narrow minded nationalist
man will first become a planetary citizen and then a citizen of the
Universe." Tomas was optimistic that the pact would "concluded
at the dawn of the space age so that people on this planet should live
in peace and plenty building bridges to the stars." Tomas' plans
feel on deaf ears. In the wake of the popularity of von Daniken's book
"Chariots of the Gods?", Tomas was able to get his own book
out. "We are not the first - Riddles of ancient science" was
published in 1971.
It was dedicated the Count of
Saint-Germain! He followed it in quick succession with "Atlantis:
From legend to discovery", "Beyond the Time barrier",
"On the shores of Endless worlds" and his true passion, "Shambhala:
Oasis of light". His lifetime of work in esoteric traditions had
come full circle. The UFO occult connections had taken his a long way.
Jarrold's journey was not quite so liberating.
Photos here
THE DELLER FALLOUT
Gordon Deller did not restrict
his attention to Jarrold and Fulton. Beyond Australia and New Zealand
he met with "researchers" in the United States. He was alleged
to have a strong interest in Communist Russia and while in the US met
with the fascist leader William Dudley Pelley who was at the time dabbling
in an eclectic mix of occult and flying saucer related mysticism. Fulton
wrote to Barker concluding, "I am not altogether certain of (Deller's)
real motives."
It was even alleged that Deller
may have been a government agent. While some intelligence operatives
are a little weird and somewhat paranoid (perhaps a hazard of the trade)
I don't think they were quite that weird. The alleged source of the
government agent rumour about Deller could not confirm the story when
I spoke to him.
Jarrold failed to see the shallowness
and facile nature of much of the UFO occult claims. Unlike Tomas, Jarrold
could not readily see beyond it to avoid its inevitable pitfalls. Harold
Fulton's reaction to Gordon Deller was an entirely rational one. Fulton
was a New Zealand Air Force officer and his military pragmatic background
rejected Deller's UFO vision steeped in spiritualism, "Oahspe -
the Kosmon Bible", and sightings of mile long Etherian spaceships
Deller even went into a trance
transmitting purported messages from the Etherians to Fulton. Deller
indicated that Fulton and others (including Jarrold) had been specially
chosen by the "Etherians" to prepare the ground for them.
Deller indicated he had see their ships but had only contacted the crew
in trance.
Fulton could not accept these
ideas at all. He was only interested in factual sightings and not in
any fantastic aspect of "explanations". In short he thought
Deller was a nut. Occult diehards with UFO persuasions may cling to
the claim that Fulton experienced an illness of 3 days duration following
Deller's visit. Coincidence is more likely, as Fulton went on to provide
a balanced and enduring legacy for New Zealand ufology through the 1950s.
Although old age slowed him down he was even representing MUFON during
the 1970s.
Photos here
Harold Fulton
JARROLD AND THE RAAF
Whatever the original effects
of Deller's theories, Edgar Jarrold was by the middle of 1954 experiencing
the high point of his ufological career. He had received an official
invitation from the then Minister for Air, William McMahon, for a meeting
with Air Force Intelligence in Melbourne. The impetus for this was the
coincidence of UFO sightings that seemed to confirm Jarrold's predictions
of an increase in reports in June - July, 1954, during the closest approach
of Mars to Earth. Jarrold was not alone in support for this theory.
Even Harry Turner promoted it
in the anonymous article he authored for the Melbourne Argus newspaper
on June 26th, 1954.
Turner was to gain full access
to the DAFI UFO files of the day to undertake an offically requested
classified "scientific appreciation" of their contents. Jarrold
was only to gain a meeting with DAFI officer Squadron Leader Peter Birch,
but he was given a set of still prints from 94 frames of the controversial
Drury UFO film.
It must have seemed unusual that
Jarrold ceased to operate his group by 1955, apparently because of "personal
reasons". It seemed to have nothing to do with "security matters".
Jarrold's departure produced wild speculation, part of which was fuelled
by the fact that he had meet with Air Force Intelligence on July 19,
1954.
The Minister for Air, William
McMahon, had written to Edgar Jarrold on July 6, 1954, suggesting that
he visit Melbourne for discussions with Air Force Intelligence. On July
19, Jarrold met with Sqd. Leader A.H. Birch. According to Jarrold, Birch
candidly discussed Air Force policy on the "flying saucers".
Jarrold indicated that
Birch stated that:
(a) The RAAF had "a completely
open mind" regarding the origin of UFOs
(b) At present the Air Force
was awaiting "depth of evidence" as to the precise source
of the objects themselves.
(c) "the greater threat"
to Australia was then believed by the Air Force to be coming from South
East Asia, for which reason, "no intensification of RAAF research
is planned immediately",
(d) current RAAF research was
carried out along almost identical lines being pursued by Jarrold's
group.
Much of the discussion, according
to Jarrold, centred around the question of origin of the "flying
saucers" rather than on speculation as to their mere existence.
Particular mention was made of the validity of "the Mars theory"
and "UFO occupants".
Again Jarrold wrote that Squadron
Leader Birch infered that the absence of verified landing reports made
it appear certain that "the Martains are unlike us". Jarrold
indicated, "S/L Birch appeared baffled by the apparent inability
of UFO occupants to land openly and gave (me) the impression that the
belief held officially that "the Martians are unlike us" followed
consideration of the occupants' apparent inability to manufacture suitable
artificial aids such as spacesuits as we know them..."
Jarrold indicated that the popular
civilian theory was "the Interplanetary theory". S/L Birch
rejected the "unidentified Natural Phenomena theory" immediately
pointing out that "if this is the case, surely the fact would have
been established with certainty long ago." Jarrold also attributed
to Birch the position that the Drury film and the possibility of it
being a rocket from Woomera, was not only discounted, but even ridiculed.
Birch, himself, painted a different
picture. In a letter to South Australian researcher Fred Stone, by then
Wing Commander Birch atated, "...information given by the RAAF
is naturally limited, and no access is given to our files. In the same
way, Mr. Jarrold did not repeat evaluated comment but rather an incident
of conversation, which would not have been the text of a formal statement
." Basically Birch was saying that Jarrold had not been given file
access, and Jarrold's emphasis were not correct.
PERSPECTIVES
Such developments were to confirm
Jarrold as the leading civilian Australian UFO researcher of his day.
They also served to deepen the mystery of Jarrold's "disappearance".
What is clear is that matters much more prosaic, such as the pressure
of his dedication and increasing obssession with flying saucers on his
own private life and family and their eventual disintergration, were
the main factors for Jarrold's departure from the Australian UFO scene.
Deller's intrusion into his
life and his flirtation with the Australian military were not the key
factors. For example as late as mid 1955 when he was by all accounts
departed from the scene, a feature article in People magazine headlined
"The Australian Flying Saucer Bureau believes MARTIANS
MAY LAND HERE NEXT YEAR" and focusing
on Jarrold, confirmed that despite all the other intrigues that had
diverted him up until then, Edgar Jarrold was still enamoured by his
Martian theory - a theory that he had entertained since 1952.
He resurfaced briefly in the early seventies to
titillate some researchers of that period, but ultimately the Jarrold
enigma remained unresolved. The net effect back in the fifties though
was that Jarrold, who had met with the RAAF in 1954 and had been the
leading civilian figure in ufology, had by the second half of 1955,
disappeared from the UFO scene. South Australian researcher Fred Stone
tried to move into the centre stage of Australian civilian research,
and take up Jarrold's fallen mantle, but progressively state borders
lead to the formation of independent groups.
These included the UFO Investigation
Centre (UFOIC) in 1955 with Dr. W.P. Clifford and from 1958 with Dr.
Miran Lindtner, the Queensland Flying Saucer Research Bureau (QFSRB
- now known as UFO Research (Qld)), with Charles Middleborough in 1956
and with Stan Seers from 1957, and the Victorian Flying Saucer Research
Society (VFSRS - now known as the Victorian UFO Research Society), with
Peter Norris in 1957.
REFERENCES
Barker, Gray. They knew too much
about flying saucers. New York: University Books, 1956
Bender, Albert. Flying Saucers
and the three men.
Clarksburg, W.Va.: Saucerian
Books, 1962
Davis, Robert, Letters to Bill
Chalker, 1982
Jarrold, Edgar, Australian Saucer
Record, February, 1955.
Jarrold, Edgar, "The Port
Moresby Photos", Australian Flying Saucer Magazine, (February,1955):
2-3.
Jarrold, Edgar, in Albert Bender,
1962, ibid.
Jarrold, Edgar, Letter to Frank
Wilkes, April 1st, 1972
People, (Magazine - Australia),
"Martians May land here next year", People, (July 27, 1955):
23-24,26-28.
Thomas, P.D., "Those Men
in Black Suits! - Or, Let's Get this straight", Australian Saucer
Record, Vol. 2. No.2. Second Quarter, 1956, pg. 12-17.
Tomas, Andrew, Letter to Gray
Barker, February 20th, 1956 (quote supplied by Robert Davis, 1982)